The presentation of the research, planning and evaluation may take me rorrn oT anyone, or
combination of two or more, of the following:
• a presentation using slideshow software such as Powerpoint;
• a blog or website;
• a podcast;
• a DVD with 'extras'.
In the evaluation the following questions must be answered:
• In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real
media products?
• How does your media product represent particular social groups?
• What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
• Who would be the audience for your media product?
• How did you attract/address your audience?
• What have you learnt about technologies from the process of constructing this product?
• Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from
it to the full product?
Ideas for the format for the presentation of the evaluation can be found in the Guidance Notes.
The production element and presentation of research and planning may be individual or group
work (maximum group size is four candidates). Where candidates have worked in a group, the
evidence for assessment may be presented collectively but centres will still assess candidates on
an individual basis for their contribution to aspects of the work, from plann ing, research and
produ ction to evaluation.
G321 is marked and internally standardised by the centre and marks are submitted to OCR by a
specified date, a sample is then selected for external moderation. The unit is marked out of a total
of 100 marks: 20 marks for the presentation of the planning and research; 60 marks for the
construction: 20 marks for the evaluation.
Monday, 5 January 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment